L'évolution du dessin: les meilleurs trucs et astuces de l'histoire

Figure Drawing Methods of the Masters

There’s been a huge resurgence of interest in the practice of academic figure drawing, accompanied by much debate about the best way to draw the figure in a “classical manner.” Although it may seem impossible to add anything new in this field, below artist Robert Zeller shares an approach that can be considered an evolution of existing figure drawing methods and schools, rather than something radically new.

This approach combines three figure drawing methods adopted by significant schools of thought throughout the centuries. Enjoy!

Artists Network | Evolution of Figure Drawing | Figure Drawing Methods | Robert Zeller

Jamaal (graphite on paper, 24×29) by Robert Zeller

1. Disegno

Disegno is the Italian word for drawing. But in the context of the Renaissance, its meaning is multifaceted. It encompasses not only line but also form, composition and — most importantly for us — gesture.

Gesture refers to the way rhythm and movement flow through a single figure. Gesture not only adds life to a drawing, but can help join multiple figures in a composition. This is a conceptual approach, given that no one walks around with visible rhythm lines flowing through his or her body.

The philosophy of disegno involves integrating the figure into the space around it in a believable manner.

Artists Network | Evolution of Figure Drawing | Figure Drawing Methods | Robert Zeller

Disegno was used by the masters of the Italian Renaissance, and we can see it clearly in Michelangelo’s Pietà. The main figure appears monumental, and the gesture lines that flow through it, indicated here with red lines, are powerful and full of life — ironic, given that it’s a scene of the dead Christ.

2. The Academic Method

The method of figure drawing taught at modern ateliers is based on methodologies formulated by the École des Beaux-Arts, the principal French academy in the 19th century. The core concept of “training the artist’s eye” stems from drawing courses such as those designed by Charles Bargue (ca 1826–83) and Bernard Romain Julien (1802–71).

Schools in this tradition strive to teach artists to represent nature faithfully. They don’t all use precisely the same methods, but they generally have two points in common: an emphasis on light and shadow, and a focus on converting three-dimensional figures into flat, two-dimensional shapes. Both of these areas of emphasis emulate nature as accurately as possible.

I was trained in the Water Street Atelier system. This approach begins by blocking in using straight lines, establishing proportions and moving from the general to the specific in creating forms and subforms. Each subsequent pass brings more detailed information, all based on the dividing point between light and shadow, called the terminator.

The method culminates in a rather sophisticated conceptualization of surface form, one that is not based on perception but rather on an understanding of the relationship between surface form and light source. The result can convey a beautiful 3D illusion.

Artists Network | Evolution of Figure Drawing | Figure Drawing Methods | Robert Zeller

Léon Cogniet’s Male Nude From the Back shows an anatomical study. Notice the terrific contrapposto and strong modeling on the figure’s back. The medium, white chalk and charcoal on gray paper, is terrific for creating volume and form, using a middle tone as the ground.

3. The Anatomical-Structural Approach

If you’re going to draw the figure well, then you have to know anatomy. For anatomy to make sense, you want to learn the interior architecture and geometry of the figure. The best approach I’ve found is the anatomical-structural approach. Though this is what I call it, it has several other names, including architectonic and stereographic.

This method has a long history, which goes back as far as Albrecht Dürer and Luca Cambiaso. I learned this approach from the sculptor Sabin Howard, who in turn learned it from the sculptor and anatomist Walter Erlebacher.

The premise is simple. Rather than memorize long lists of muscles and bones, break the figure down into geometric shapes. Rectangular blocks and cubes are usually the most helpful, but there are also cones, cylinders, ovals and spheres.

Try conceiving the body as made up of these shapes. This then provides context and function for the relevant anatomy, making it easier and more practical to remember. Artists also build a conceptual figure in their mind and compare the actual model to that ideal, conceptual model.

Artists Network | Evolution of Figure Drawing | Figure Drawing Methods | Robert Zeller

In this anatomical demonstration, Roberto Osti shows a box conception of the figure to the left and a conceptual skeleton to the right.

Draw Your Own Way

How you put these three figure drawing methods together in your own practice will be as personal for you as it is for me, tailored to your specific strengths and weaknesses. I have taught figure drawing since 2009, when I founded the Teaching Studios of Art. My motivations for creating this synthesis were practical, born of a real need to simplify the process for my students.

I hope you forge ahead and create your own variation, contributing your personal approach and vision to this ever-changing tradition.

A version of this story, written by Robert Zeller, appeared in Artists Magazine. To receive the magazine, click here to subscribe.

 

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

2 × quatre =